In a recent address, AIADMK Chief Edappadi K. Palaniswami (EPS) launched a scathing attack on the Chief Minister of Tamil Nadu, M.K. Stalin, accusing him of using the Directorate of Vigilance and Anti-Corruption (DVAC) as a tool to settle political scores. EPS claimed that Stalin was manipulating the state investigative agency for his personal and political gains, calling it a blatant abuse of power.
EPS highlighted several instances where he alleged that Stalin had misused the DVAC to target AIADMK members and leaders. One such case involved the arrest of AIADMK leader and former Minister S. P. Velumani, who was detained by the DVAC on charges of corruption related to the awarding of government contracts. EPS argued that these cases were politically motivated and aimed at tarnishing the reputation of AIADMK leaders.
Furthermore, EPS accused Stalin of indulging in vendetta politics by targeting his political rivals through the DVAC. He pointed out that even former Ministers Dindigul C. Sreenivasan and K. C. Veeramani had faced similar actions by the investigative agency under Stalin’s leadership. EPS emphasized that the DVAC should function independently and without any political interference to maintain the sanctity of its operations.
Citing statistics from the newspaper’s database, it is worth noting that since Stalin assumed office as Chief Minister, there has been a noticeable increase in the number of cases registered by the DVAC. This has raised concerns among political analysts and opposition leaders, who claim that the agency is being used as a tool to suppress dissent and consolidate power.
The AIADMK Chief called for an impartial investigation into the functioning of the DVAC under Stalin’s administration, stressing the need for transparency and fairness. He urged the authorities to uphold the principles of justice and ensure that the agency does not become a puppet in the hands of those in power.
In response to these allegations, representatives from the ruling party defended the actions of the DVAC, stating that the agency was simply carrying out its duty to root out corruption and ensure accountability in public offices. They argued that the increase in cases registered by the DVAC was a result of the government’s commitment to combating corruption, rather than political vendetta.
The ongoing feud between the AIADMK and DMK parties has escalated with these allegations, further intensifying the political landscape in Tamil Nadu. As the state gears up for the next assembly elections, the allegations against the DVAC and the ensuing political drama are likely to play a crucial role in shaping the public sentiment and determining the political fortunes of both parties.
In conclusion, AIADMK Chief EPS has accused Tamil Nadu Chief Minister Stalin of exploiting the DVAC for his own political agenda and settling scores with opposition leaders. The allegations suggest a misuse of power and highlight the need for an impartial investigation into the functioning of the agency. As the political battle between AIADMK and DMK continues, the actions of the DVAC are likely to remain under scrutiny, impacting the electoral landscape in Tamil Nadu.
